SC Framework on Death Penalty and Mercy Pleas

SC Framework on Death Penalty and Mercy Pleas

The Supreme Court has issued detailed directives to streamline the execution of death sentences and the processing of mercy pleas, ensuring greater efficiency and accountability. Recently, it upheld the Bombay High Court’s 2019 decision to commute the death sentences of two convicts in the 2007 Pune BPO gang-rape and murder case to life imprisonment of 35 years due to delays in execution.

SC Guidelines on Death Penalty and Mercy Petitions
Dedicated Cells for Mercy Pleas
States and Union Territories are required to establish dedicated cells in their Home or Prison Departments to ensure efficient handling of mercy petitions within the stipulated timeframe. A designated officer will oversee operations, while legal compliance will be ensured by a representative from the Law or Justice Department.

Prompt Information Sharing
Prison authorities must forward mercy petitions and associated details—such as convict profiles, incarceration history, and court documents—to the dedicated cell without delay. Police reports, FIRs, trial evidence, and judgments should also be shared with the Home Department Secretary and the designated officer. Mercy petitions must then be swiftly submitted to the Governor or President’s Secretariat.

Emphasis on Electronic Communication
To enhance efficiency, electronic communication (e.g., email) is mandated for correspondence, barring cases requiring confidentiality.

Death Sentence Record Management
Sessions Courts are instructed to maintain comprehensive records of death sentence cases and promptly list them upon receiving directives from higher courts. Notices will also be issued to Public Prosecutors or investigation agencies to determine the status of appeals, reviews, or mercy petitions.

Execution Warrant Protocol
A mandatory 15-day interval is required between the issuance and execution of a death warrant. Convicts must be informed of their rights and provided immediate legal aid if requested to challenge the warrant.

Role of State Governments
State Governments must apply for execution warrants promptly after the death penalty is finalized and enforceable.  

Death Penalty and Mercy Petition
What is the Death Penalty?
Capital punishment is the gravest penalty in India’s judicial system, reserved for heinous offenses such as murder, terrorism, and specific crimes under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (2023) and other laws.

Legal Framework
The Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita replaces the Indian Penal Code and prescribes the death penalty for crimes like rape resulting in death, gang rape of minors, and serial rape. While the Constitution permits the death penalty, its application is limited to the "rarest of rare" cases, as outlined in Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980).

What is a Mercy Petition?
A mercy petition is a convict's plea to the President (Article 72) or Governor (Article 161) seeking pardon, reprieve, or commutation of their sentence. These constitutional provisions provide a final recourse for those sentenced to death.

Implications of SC Guidelines

1. Reducing Delays:
   Dedicated cells and structured procedures will ensure timely resolution of mercy pleas, expediting justice delivery. For instance, the delayed execution of convicts in the Nirbhaya case highlighted the need for such measures.
2. Enhancing Accountability:
   Clear responsibilities for departments and officials will ensure transparency and efficient tracking of cases, as emphasized in Shatrughan Chauhan v. Union of India (2014).
3. Protecting Legal and Human Rights:
   By ensuring convicts are informed of their rights and given access to legal aid, the guidelines uphold fairness and constitutional protections under Article 21.
4. Strengthened Judicial Oversight:
   Sessions Courts are tasked with rigorous record-keeping and timely case listings, ensuring checks against delays and miscarriages of justice.

Key SC Rulings on Death Penalty

• Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980): Limited death penalty to the "rarest of rare" cases.
• Jagmohan Singh v. State of UP (1973): Confirmed the constitutionality of the death penalty under Article 21.
• Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983): Established guidelines for identifying "rarest of rare" cases.

Key Takaways
The Supreme Court’s guidelines aim to streamline the death penalty and mercy plea process, ensuring timely justice while balancing the severity of capital punishment with fairness, transparency, and human rights. These reforms enhance judicial accountability and uphold constitutional values.

Mind Sprint